Talk:De Ortu Waluuanii

King Arthur Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject King Arthur, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of King Arthur, the Arthurian era and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.King ArthurWikipedia:WikiProject King ArthurTemplate:WikiProject King ArthurKing Arthur articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Date and Authorship

The section titled date and authorship is causing me a lot of problems...Date could mean anything... is there something that will either divide the section so that the paragraphs for date and authorship are in separate sections or can we find a title that is more concise? SADADS (talk) 15:28, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's about as good as it's gonna get... the section is about context, namely, when the scholars think it was written, and who wrote it. There isn't much to say about either one, so there's no need to put them in different sections. Perhaps "dating and authorship" would be better?--Cúchullain ^t/c 18:49, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

History of the text? SADADS (talk) 06:21, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I changed it to "History".--Cúchullain ^t/c 12:08, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]