Talk:De Gruyter

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Walter de Gruyter is a notable scholarly publisher, particularly of German language materials. It publishes over 250 books a year and over 60 scholarly journals. The publisher may be more recognizable in Germany (where it has offices) than in United States but that doesn't mean it shouldn't be included. I think any publisher that publishes this many books should be on Wikipedia. I was surprised it wasn't on already. The publisher's website lists an impressive history dating back over 250 years involving its role as publisher to King Frederick II. There is much that can be written on this publisher, who has a list of over 8000 books; I have only begun with a couple of sentences just to solidify the entry.

Their book A Handbook of Varieties of English was nominated for the AKEP Award 2006 for innovation in electronic publishing.Jacqueslacansan 07:20, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not being the authorl I removed the speedy tag. The completely unwarranted tag, since the quickest check even on Google,would have found the many journals etc. published. This article does need documentation. I put on a tag for expand and for sources. DGG 11:18, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

rename

The official website is de gryter with no walter; any cons to renaming the article accordingly? Fgnievinski (talk) 04:52, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The official history of the company (see current ref 1) says that the name of the company is Walter de Gruyter. Seems that (as our article says) they presnet their brand as "de Gruyter". The latter redirects here, so there's not much ambiguity. Having said that, I don't have any strong feelings about this, as long as the article mentions the full official name. --Randykitty (talk) 09:10, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Walter de Gruyter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921090954/http://www.libraries.wright.edu/noshelfrequired/2012/01/09/degruyter-acquires-versita-increasing-their-open-access-publishing-business/ to http://www.libraries.wright.edu/noshelfrequired/2012/01/09/degruyter-acquires-versita-increasing-their-open-access-publishing-business/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:19, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 October 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jerm (talk) 14:12, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Walter de Gruyter → De Gruyter – "De Gruyter", the name most commonly used by the publisher, is more concise than "Walter de Gruyter". De Gruyter's website and publications primarily use "De Gruyter" without the "Walter". Reliable sources including The Bookseller, Books+Publishing, and Publishers Weekly use "De Gruyter" to refer to the publisher. — Newslinger talk 10:09, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Clearly the common name. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:23, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 13:23, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Grimes2 (talk) 13:36, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support clear common name. (t · c) buidhe 20:02, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"De Gruyter Open (formerly Versita)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect De Gruyter Open (formerly Versita) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 15#De Gruyter Open (formerly Versita) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:14, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]