Talk:DeQueen Formation
This is the talk page of a redirect that has been merged and now targets the page: • De Queen Formation Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:De Queen Formation Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for merging with De Queen Formation on 28 April 2019. The result of the discussion (permanent link) was consensus to merge. |
Requested move 29 March 2019
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Procedural close. This should have been a merge discussion in the first place, so since this page was created first, in 2009, and the suggested target page was created in 2014, it is unclear which way the merge should go. In accord with WP:MERGE, involved editors will be notified of the ensuing merger discussion. Kudos to editors for your input, and Happy Publishing! (nac by page mover) Paine Ellsworth, ed. put'r there 14:01, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
It was proposed in this section that DeQueen Formation be renamed and moved to De Queen Formation.
The discussion has been closed. Links: current log • target log |
DeQueen Formation → De Queen Formation – USGS's National Geologic Map Database describes this lithostratigraphic unit at Geologic Unit: De Queen naming it "De Queen Formation." Trilotat (talk) 21:31, 29 March 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. Iffy★Chat -- 09:34, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to De Queen Formation which already exists so move is inappropriate. Sources are divided as are our other article titles but go with De Queen, Arkansas etc rather than DeQueen School District etc IMO. Andrewa (talk) 01:49, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Merge per Andrewa. SITH (talk) 11:22, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Merger proposal
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion is to merge this article into De Queen Formation. Merger has been completed. Paine Ellsworth, ed. put'r there 14:17, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
It has been proposed that this article be merged into De Queen Formation. Arguments may follow: (Paine Ellsworth, ed. put'r there 15:25, 28 April 2019 (UTC))
- Merge and redirect to De Queen Formation which already exists so move is inappropriate. Sources are divided as are our other article titles but go with De Queen, Arkansas etc rather than DeQueen School District etc IMO. Andrewa (talk) 01:49, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
- Merge per Andrewa. SITH (talk) 11:22, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
- MergeRyan shell (talk) 13:25, 29 April 2019 (UTC)