This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This page should not be speedily deleted because it was just released and doesn’t mean it is not charted yet doesn’t mean it is not notable and will not be charted. So many other group’s albums and singles have not been charted yet but was created and published but non of them were nominated for speedy deletion and redirect? I don’t get why Dazzle Dazzle has to be be deleted. Does your favourite BTS “On” show significance yet? Obviously not by why arent you guys contesting it for speedy deletion? Like what I’ve said, Everglow’s Reminiscence, Pentagon’s Universe: The Black Hall, Loona’s Hash all wasn’t notable or “significant” yet no one redirected, suggesting to delete them when it was created without context and even way before the album was released. NCT’s Neo Zone article surely is worse than Dazzle Dazzle with only 1 ref and a track list and yet no one said anything. If you are so free and want to delete, find other articles instead. WHY are you doing this only to this article? If YOU didn’t request deletion or redirect to those articles, with what RIGHTS are you to do this to Dazzle Dazzle because from what I see, this is plain bias and not objective. Coolbruh123 (talk) 10:39, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
