Jump to content

Talk:Dayton, Ohio/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 15:19, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 15:19, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overall summary

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


A comprehensive, well-referenced, well-illustrated, article.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    Article has 111 citations, which is good, but there are some unreferenced statements.
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    Well illustrated.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Well illustrated.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

This is a comprehensive article, generally well-referenced and well-illustrated. You have a few (about 8) broken web links (see [[1]]) and in places your citations are somewhat absent, so it would not make WP:FAC without improvements. But this is WP:GAN, so I'm awarding GA-status. I enjoyed reading this article and learnt a few things: I knew about Wright-Patterson AFB, but I did not know until know that the "Wright" was Wright the pioneer of flight. Congratulations on producing a Good Article. Pyrotec (talk) 17:05, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]