Talk:Daylight (Bobby Womack song)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Daylight (Bobby Womack song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Someone please post the single cover!!!!! I dunno how to do that in wikipedia.
http://bp3.blogger.com/_-BpF23RzxKE/R9ZbjoZNQaI/AAAAAAAAEyQ/Q-yQKx5SjS4/s1600-h/Kelly+Rowland+-+Daylight+Remixes+Official+Cover.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.48.205.82 (talk) 06:19, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Im fairly certain the video for Daylight was shot in NYC approximately 10 blocks from the Empire State Building. Where is the "shot in the UK" source?
This song features Travis McCoy of Gym Class Heroes
[edit]So why do people keep changing it back to Gym Class Heroes. The cover of the single is pretty conclusive about this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.3.59.195 (talk) 17:11, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- By the way, I found a link from MTV.com that says its with "Gym Class Heroes" and not just Travis McCoy.
http://buzzworthy.mtv.com/2008/01/28/kelly-rowland-and-gym-class-heroes-party-down/ http://www.gymclassheroes-fan.info/kelly-rowland-feat-gym-class-heroes-daylight-official-video/ http://www.gymclassheroes-fan.info/new-kelly-rowlandgym-class-heroes-track-officially-leaked/ http://www.imeem.com/people/4OREEy http://www.musicloversgroup.com/kelly-rowland-feat-gym-class-heroes-daylight/
- None of which look very official to me. It's like getting info from TRL or TMZ. Wolfer68 (talk) 19:46, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Also, we originally had it as "Gym Class Heroes", it doesn't make sense with the artist chronology, since Travis does not sing "Clothes Off!!!" and most of the sites that I go to list them as being featured.
Genevieve-Tamerlaine (talk) 09:54, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- That is ridiculous rationale... so, just because we had it wrong to begin with you think we should keep it wrong? The artist chronology can be changed. And those "most sites" you quoted above are not reliable. Try http://www.kellyrowlandonline.com which IS official. If it was "featuring Gym Class Heroes" they wouldn't single out Travis McCoy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.28.92.5 (talk) 09:46, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
It makes perfect sense for it to be "Travis McCoy of Gym Class Heroes", as it is written on the cover art! Having it as GCH is not factually correct, and isn't that what we should be aiming for? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.28.92.5 (talk) 09:25, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Kelly Rowland Daylight.jpg
[edit]Image:Kelly Rowland Daylight.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:38, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Is there a reason...
[edit]why this article mainly focuses on the cover version and contains next to no information about the original song? Boecker59 (talk) 16:12, 16 August 2012 (UTC)