Talk:Daya

Requested move 13 October 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. If Sikhism's and Hinduism's Daya are not related, there is nothing to merge. (non-admin closure) © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 09:29, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Daya (disambiguation) → Daya
Daya → Daya (Sikhism)

– We currently have two articles based on the Sanskrit for "compassion", one for Sikhs, one for Hindus - this is really the same thing, but while we have two articles the base word should be a dab page. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:00, 13 October 2016 (UTC)--Relisting. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 05:40, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Daya in Sikhism isn't the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of the term Daya.[1]--Cúchullain ^t/c 14:26, 17 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose where is the article for "Daya" in Hinduism? The correct approach would be to merge that content to the current article about Sikhism. SST flyer 10:59, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Daya (Hinduism) is not part of Daya (Sikhism). There doesn't have to be a standalone article, please see WP:Disambiguation. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:34, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

this is really the same thing if so, WP:CFORKs should not exist. SST flyer 03:46, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is it? Please look at our religion articles. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:27, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More to the point, there are a number of other articles called "Daya", and this one isn't the most prominent among them.--Cúchullain ^t/c 13:33, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support ~~Oppose~~ As Cúchullain points out, there are other topics that could be primary. Just going by page views, daya is bested by Daya (singer). — Gorthian (talk) 00:31, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gorthian, did you mean support then?Cúchullain ^t/c 00:55, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, yes. Fixed. Thanks, Cúchullain! — Gorthian (talk) 01:01, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.