Talk:Day One (Torchwood)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: JuneGloom Talk 21:55, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Good evening/afternoon/morning! I'll review this article momentarily. - JuneGloom Talk 21:55, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   I took care of a couple of typos and a repetition.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   No dead links and the sources look okay to me. I can't see any evidence of original research.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   The article is stable.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   The images are good, one fair use with a proper rationale and one free one respectively.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Just one thing and nothing to really stop me from passing the article, but at the end of the first paragraph in Filming it says; "However, the sequence had to be shot again twelve days later." Was a reason given for this?