Talk:Davis & Geck
This page was proposed for deletion by MarkH21 (talk · contribs) on 7 February 2019 with the comment: Fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:ORGCRIT. Only sources are a trivial mention of the introduction of their product Dexon and an article on the acquisition of the company that acquired the 3rd successor parent of the article subject. A search for sources does not turn up any significant coverage from WP:RS. It was contested by Atlantic306 (talk · contribs) on 13 February 2019 with the comment: Deprod - should be notable given its history |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Davis & Geck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060129230630/http://www.lib.uconn.edu/online/research/speclib/ASC/findaids/Davisgeck/MSS19980297.html to http://www.lib.uconn.edu/online/research/speclib/ASC/findaids/Davisgeck/MSS19980297.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:17, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
- Stub-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- Stub-Class company articles
- Unknown-importance company articles
- Automatically assessed Companies articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Start-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Unknown-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Start-Class medicine articles
- Low-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages