Talk:Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada: Toronto / Law Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The deleted copyrighted material submission dated 23:00, 30 August 2006, is perfectly fine, on the firms behalf I will allow it. I will send further correspondance to permissions at wikimedia dot org. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jeremy.howell (talk • contribs) .

Sorry but we can't just take you at your word on this. It's unlikely that a law firm would be interested in relicensing their website content to be compatible with wikipedia's licensing scheme, so you'll have to do more to show otherwise. -PullUpYourSocks 18:23, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So.. Could you explain why taking an excerpt from our website isn't acceptable? Would someone like an email proving that I handle technical issues within the organization?--Jeremy.howell 23:00, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whether you are really associated with Davies it not the issue, rather the issue is whether the copyright holder of the website material has properly granted a GFDL compatible license for the work. This license means that Davies is not just giving permission to use the material on wikipedia, but it is also granting permission for anyone to copy, modify, and restribute any part of the material as long as they conform to the terms of the GFDL. The implications of the license are pretty huge. Particularly, it means that Davies will have a hard time ever protecting the use of the material on the website because everyone would be able to use the work as they choose. Clearly, it is not in their interest to license their material and so I'm doubtful they ever would. In any event, something more than "I will allow it on my company's behalf" is required to grant the license. That is hardly proof verifying that you have legally bound Davis to the terms of the license. I'd suggest looking at the process for granting permission here. If you can confirm with the wikipedia PR department that the license has been properly granted then the material can stay. Otherwise, you really don't give us much to go on. --PullUpYourSocks 02:47, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PullUpYourSocks, I understand your comments and will create original text for the wikipedia Davies page. My concern was with the slavies attribute which I thought was completely uncalled for and not necessary.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nickrubbo (talk • contribs) .