A fact from David Washbrook appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 February 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that British historian and South-Asian history expert David Washbrook called the UK Home Office out on its misrepresentation of slavery and British colonization?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of the University of Cambridge WikiProject, an attempt to improve articles relating to the University of Cambridge, and to standardize and extend the coverage of the University in the encyclopedia. If you would like to participate, you can help us by editing the article attached to this notice, or you could visit the project page, where you can join the project, learn more about it, see what needs to be done, or contribute to the discussion.University of CambridgeWikipedia:WikiProject University of CambridgeTemplate:WikiProject University of CambridgeUniversity of Cambridge articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Substantial article in memory, on good sources, no copyvio obvious. In the hook, I'd have his name first and then, the description, and I'd say "Indian" specifically, and I'd try to mention a university or two rather than a pale "British". In the article, I'd drop the works from the infobox, - his topic seems stronger than the longish titles. I'd first say who his parents were, and then let the father die. The last para before death might profit from splitting in shorter sentences, - I had to read it several times. I don't think his death deserves an extra header. These are just suggestions. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Gerda. Hope you are doing well. I have factored in some of the changes that I definitely agree on. Someone had edited the article after me, and hence, I had to make some minor edits there. Please choose from one of the two hooks from below. Thanks again. Good day. Ktin (talk) 00:59, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ALT1... that British historian and South-Asian history expert David Washbrook called the UK Home Office out on its misrepresentation of slavery and British colonization?
Thank you, and I'm fine with the article changes. The hook didn't change much, - How about getting his name to the front, and saying India, not South Asia? - I'd do it but then can't review. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Gerda. Let's leave it as South-Asia, since he did focus on the region. Also, the sequencing reads alright to me -- so, if it is ok with you lets go with ALT1 as it stands now. Thanks as always. Ktin (talk) 14:10, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Substantial article in memory, on good sources, no copyvio obvious. In the hook, I'd have his name first and then, the description, and I'd say "Indian" specifically, and I'd try to mention a university or two rather than a pale "British". In the article, I'd drop the works from the infobox, - his topic seems stronger than the longish titles. I'd first say who his parents were, and then let the father die. The last para before death might profit from splitting in shorter sentences, - I had to read it several times. I don't think his death deserves an extra header. These are just suggestions. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
