Talk:David Rivera

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Florida

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

New York City

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Congress

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

""Rep. David Rivera's war with Wikipedia"". Politico. 4/7/11. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

Untitled

It looks like Mr. Rivera wrote this wiki himself. Something needs to be done about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.176.245.57 (talk) 20:38, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV edits

I removed a whole bunch of new material that was a verbatim copy/paste from Rivera's campaign site [1]. Per WP:NPOV, Wikipedia is not the place to promote a candidate. That said, if someone wants to flesh out the issues section of the article in a neutral way with citations, I think that would be welcomed by everyone. Arbor832466 (talk) 21:09, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest editing

I already warned the user, but thought this was also worth noting here; see [2] Arbor832466 (talk) 23:11, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Politico

"Rep. David Rivera war with Wikipedia" "The Florida Republican's staffers are carefully policing his Wikipedia entry." article by Marin Cogan in Politico 4/7/11 4:37 AM EDT Updated: 4/7/11 6:46 AM EDT User:Fred Bauder Talk 11:03, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit in story User:Fred Bauder Talk 11:11, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Should the Politico story be added as a new controversy? (Aximill (talk) 14:02, 7 April 2011 (UTC))[reply]

No, I think we need to step back for a minute. Due to the inevitable flood of post Politico angst edits I've requested a page protect here. Keep in mind that this is a WP:BLP and of a freshmen Congressmen no less. Let's look for good sources with solid reporting on things that are biographically relevant and then bring them here to discuss before we put them in. TomPointTwo (talk) 15:19, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly is irrelevant about having your press secretary whitewash your Wikipedia page and having that make national news? I mean, this seems like a significant story to me, certainly one worth a brief NPOV mention. I don't think we need paragraphs upon paragraphs, but surely a sentence or two is reasonable. 24.151.11.122 (talk) 15:50, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't jump to conclusions. I haven't yet said anything is or isn't relevant; I was just urging that care be taken and changes be discussed. I'd also suggest that you refrain from hyperbolic and inflammatory language like "whitewash". We have a tradition of assuming good faith here. TomPointTwo (talk) 17:17, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Methinks the allegation(which has been reported by several news sources) of having a political figures' press secretary whitewashing a Wikipedia page to remove politically damaging information is very relevant. I would also say that having the politico article mentioned above would count as a "good source" and as "solid reporting" and the inevitable flood coming from the visibility of the news story would be valuable to this Wikipedia entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oneromnala (talk • contribs) 18:05, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I disagree. WP:BLP requires that we look at the totality of someone's career. This is one mention in an article, and it's not even really about him - it's about HER. In my opinion, this has no place in this article. - Philippe 20:16, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, it's about her, not about him. And as much as it may have been not-NPOV, this article would seem to be significantly lacking his voting records and anything he's actually done, other than his controversies. In the interest of balance, some of that content should probably be considered as worthy for inclusion if references are available etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.171.25.88 (talk) 22:24, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It has a place.

Beutler quoted in Politico: “All Wikipedia aims to do is reflect what is public knowledge and has been widely reported.... Anything publicly reported about their career is fair game for a Wikipedia article.”

Wikipedia isn't equipped to go beyond that aim. Calamitybrook (talk) 10:55, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia editing, and the information removed, appears to me to be right on the boundary between what is acceptable and what is not. Obviously some things happened, and they have not been adequately explained, but we do not have reliable sources for exactly what did happen. And our article reflects that; which is fair enough. User:Fred Bauder Talk 12:56, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Campaign Consultants' Wikipedia Problem" by Noah Rothman writing on campaignsandelections.com April 12, 2011, 9:27 AM

Ryan Hawkins, president of the nonpartisan, Washington, D.C.–based Winding Creek Group, says that while the game has evolved, the rules remain the same. “Campaigns and good campaign managers who ‘get it’ know you cannot manipulate sites like Wikipedia without paying a price,” says Hawkins. “It falls under the ‘don't do something stupid’ rule, which more times than not will kill a campaign.”

WP:BEAN User:Fred Bauder Talk 02:31, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This Article Is Hopelessly Out Of Date and Potentially Defamatory of Nonpublic Figures

This article is hopelessly out-of-date. I updated one part relating to Rivera's girlfriend. She is not "currently" cutting here in Nicaragua. She was informally extradited back to the US, charged, pled guilty, and sentenced. There are large swaths of material completely unsourced and potentially defamatory to living persons who are not public figures. The entire article should be deleted or brought up to date by someone interested in Florida politics, not me. FYI, there are reputable newspapers and/or other sources linking some of the figures in this article to Marco Rubio.12.227.140.232 (talk) 17:16, 16 March 2016 (UTC)Da5id403 (talk) 17:20, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on David Rivera. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. como estas

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:18, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]