This article was nominated for deletion on 15 August 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles
It is widely accepted within the poker community that Rheem is a serial scam artist and has scammed many fellow poker professionals out of hundreds of thousands of dollars.
This should be added to his wiki page as it is now such common accepted knowledge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kowalski777 (talk • contribs) 12:46, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A third party reliable source has reported on the story, PokerNews.com has written about the debt issue twice, here and to a greater extent here , WP:V says "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—whether readers can check that material in Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true" but should be written in a Neutral point of view , see WP:NPOV and with WP:BLP style see WP:BLPSTYLE. If the pokernews reports are used, the language must be done carefully, what was said came from a PokerNews report and not just an WP:OR interpretation.
I can't see any reason to fault such a mention after having seen actual publications; the article itself would likely need to have its structure altered (That is, given a structure) so that all of the info can be laid out easier. And WP:NPOV taken into consideration, of course. JaeDyWolf ~ Baka-San (talk) 20:29, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]