Talk:David Pilbeam
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on 18 February 2013. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Remeber, this is a BLP
[edit]I've removed the section on David Pilbeam's Deanship and instead included a shorter paragraph in the main section of the article. I feel this makes the article a bit more balanced. I've also cited the Harvard Crimson. The old section used loaded phrases, such as, "was marred by," and was unsourced. -Thucydides411 (talk) 20:42, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
American Scientist quote
[edit]There's an oft-quoted paragraph used by creationists suggesting that Dr. Pilbeam portrayed the field of human evolution as quackery, usually sourced to the American Scientist. Any veracity to this?52.119.105.14 (talk) 23:04, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Anthropology articles
- Unknown-importance Anthropology articles