Jump to content

Talk:David McGuinty

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Political Comments" Removed

[edit]

The contribution below was removed because it's "political" in nature. Well of course it's political - the page is about a current politician!

Please clarify what needs to be added and re-add to the page once done. ARMY101 (talk) 16:06, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify the anti-Alberta comments section was not removed, it is still in the article because it is properly sourced to independent third party references.
The "2012 Attendance Record", "Inactivity" and "2013 Attendance Record" sections were removed, not because they are political in nature, but because they are either unsourced or sourced to a Conservative party website. As explained at WP:BLP claims of this type must be sourced to independent reliable third party sources or must be removed immediately. As I indicated in the edit summary, this sort of claim can only be put back into the article with independent reliable third party sources. Postings by the article subject's political opponents are not acceptable sources. - Ahunt (talk) 16:21, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on David McGuinty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:32, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]