Talk:David Levy (psychologist)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers / Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 16 September 2019 by waddie96.

Kmh1011 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
Electrix2 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
LaviniaVasilache (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Autobiography

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

This entry was marked with an autobiography template, and as an editor that is not the subject of the entry, I am wondering what caused this entry to be marked as an autobiography and how to remove the template.

Thank you, Kmh1011 (talk) 23:31, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kmh1011, I've removed some of the promotional-sounding language. It still includes some ("garnered widespread acclaim") so it would be good to get verification for some of these statements in sources not related to the subject. Will wait to see if another helper feels the conflict-of-interest template should be removed. – Þjarkur (talk) 02:22, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have replaced "Autobiography" by "COI" without prejudice to removal. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:33, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Ruff tuff cream puff per Special:Diff/897051145. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:34, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, yes sorry for the hassle. The photograph on the article (File:Cropped Photo for Wikipedia Profile David Levy.jpg) was uploaded to Commons by User:Kmh1011 who also claimed to be "David Levy" according to the redlink. Mostly I deal with photos at Commons, as it is important to check licensing statuses due to the rather large problem of copyright violations. As per routine, was checking if the uploader is the person who created the image or had permission to license it. Due to the redlink there, assumed that "David Levy" is both the person in the photo and the person who created it, which is fine, but it raised another problem; is the person in the biographical article actually editing it, raising conflict of interest concerns. I have done this with literally hundreds of articles with similar problems, it is nothing personal. As long as the statements in the article are sourced and fluffery is kept to a minimum, I have no problem with the COI tag being removed. Thanks and sorry again for the headache! Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:34, 26 May 2019 (UTC) (Copied from User talk:ToBeFree/Archive 6#Advice on additional actions, Special:Diff/898833141. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:51, 26 May 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Pinging Ruff tuff cream puff per Special:Diff/897051145.

Thank you to Ruff tuff cream puff for the clarification.

I tried to correct the information for the pictures. Since it was my first time uploading photos to Wikipedia, I did not quite understand which information went where. I put "David Levy" as author because he is the subject in the picture. I didn't realize that I was supposed to put my own name as the author since I am the one that obtained the photo. I did not mean to claim myself as David Levy. I did add the information that permission was granted. I hope that clears up confusion and misunderstanding regarding licensing.

I also made improvements to article to increase citations and neutrality.

Would it be possible to remove the COI tag, or is there more I can do?

Thank you!

Kmh1011 (talk) 01:10, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kmh1011: What do you mean by saying that you "obtained" the photograph? JamesBWatson (talk) 09:31, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kmh1011, as I understand it you have two questions, what needs to be done about the image, and what needs to be done for the COI tag to be removed? My answers:

for the image, the photographer should create a release statement (easiest here) and send it to OTRS; that's more likely to be accepted if he/she uploads (here) an original version of the image complete with its full EXIF data
the COI demonstrably goes back to the first revision of the page; for the tag to be removed, the page needs to be completely rewritten in encyclopaedic style by a non-connected editor who will remove all unsourced and/or promotional material.

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:43, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of BLP and Third Party templates

I removed a lot of content from the page that was only sourced with primary sources, and I added secondary sources in the Acting and Stage Director sections. I removed the Third Party template because the article no longer relies primarily on sources associated with the subject. The only remaining source that is associated with the subject is the first citation, about education history, which comes from the source's university website profile. I believe this source meets the criteria for 'Self-published and questionable sources as sources on themselves' on WP:RS. There are still issues with some of the sources, but in these cases the issue is not that they are associated with the subject but that they are primary sources, or that they constitute original research.