This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles
GoodDay, do you no longer support the consensus to use them on player pages? If you don't may I start adding them to NHL team pages then since you clearly no longer respect the other side of the consensus. -DJSasso (talk) 14:29, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The policy as spelled out at Wikipedia:Article titles requires that the article title is to use the name that is most frequently used to refer to the subject in English-language reliable sources. This applies to the title of the article – but within the text of the article, pursuant to WP:MOSBIO, the person's legal name should usually appear first in the article. I trust that explains the current Wikipedia policy as it relates to this issue. Dolovis (talk) 13:41, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No actually it doesn't since you have been shown at your centralized discussion on the topic that the interpretation you have of that policy is incorrect. In fact pretty much everyone in that discussion has told you repeatedly that that isn't what the policy is. -DJSasso (talk) 14:08, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Rubbish. The policy of WP:AT and WP:EN remains in-force. There has been no consensus that reinterprets the long established policy concerning article titles. Dolovis (talk) 14:39, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
