This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
@Modest Genius: Perhaps you missed this in MOS:JOBTITLES – "The formality (officialness), specificity, or unusualness of a title is not a reason to capitalize it." An editor in chief doesn't need upper case any more than a plumber's apprentice. We don't even capitalize "king", "president" or "pope", except in very specific cases, when there's only one in the world, as in "President of the United States". Christhe spelleryack19:22, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Chris the speller: I was looking at MOS:CAPS#Titles of people, which is more comprehensible. MOS:JOBTITLES is an incoherent mess, but as far as I can tell the usage in this article matches the examples given there in the table headed 'Unmodified, denoting a title', which are all capitalised. Flower is Editor in Chief of MNRAS, a specific position & proper noun. The text is not referring to editors-in-chief in general. Neither of those guidelines say anything about 'only one in the world', but even if they did, Flower is the only Editor in Chief of MNRAS. Modest Geniustalk13:10, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Modest Genius: I wouldn't put "He was the Groundskeeper at MNRAS", even if they only had one. It's just a job. Lots of places have a groundskeeper, and lots of places have an editor in chief. Dictionaries don't capitalize either one. No need to aggrandize white-collar workers. Christhe spelleryack14:36, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Chris the speller: No, but you (presumably) would put 'Joe Biden is President of the United States' etc. because it's a proper noun, in a way that 'groundskeeper' is not. Dictionaries do not (generally) list proper nouns, so that's no guide. However it seems like a waste of time to argue about this, or to change it in articles. Modest Geniustalk13:02, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Modest Genius: Yes,the MoS says to capitalize "President of the United States" because it is " a formal title for a specific entity (or conventional translation thereof) is addressed as a title or position in and of itself, is not plural, is not preceded by a modifier (including a definite or indefinite article), and is not a reworded description". But "editor in chief of MNRAS" is just a job title followed by the place of employment, not a formal title for a specific entity. You're right, it's a waste of time to change it to upper case. Christhe spelleryack14:54, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
