Jump to content

Talk:David Coombs (lawyer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:David Edward Coombs)

Toning it down?

[edit]

Not saying that Coombs isn't a heckuva guy, but the praise in the article could probably be toned down a bit. Hammersbach (talk) 16:07, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, tone down a lot.--S. Rich (talk) 06:11, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Trimmed some fluff, added some refs. Snori (talk) 13:45, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He is not a trial advocacy professor. He teaches Criminal Law and Evidence now Wikipeediaomg (talk) 20:22, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Project listing?

[edit]

Should Mr. Coombs even have a BLP? Several reasons support AFD based on notability: 1. Significant cases are limited; 2. His article is COI'd and PUFF'd; 3. He does not have notability in the legal community, e.g., no ABOTA (American Board of Trial Advocates) rating, no NBTA certification, nor a LexisNexis Martindale-Hubbell listing. With these factors in mind, I've reduced his Project Law class to stub and removed importance. --S. Rich (talk) 15:52, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reassess to Start class & Low importance. He's Bradly Manning's defense counsel. Removed Project US as overly broad.--S. Rich (talk) 14:17, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Added "find notice" in this Discussion page

[edit]

Boyd Reimer (talk) 16:51, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Requested move 09 March 2014

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to David Coombs (lawyer). Xoloz (talk) 01:44, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]



David Edward CoombsDavid E. Coombs – Unnecessary full middle name. 71.59.58.63 (talk) 14:53, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

[edit]
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Discussion

[edit]
Any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.