Talk:David Calcutt

Untitled

Some of the items tagged as 'fact' could probably just be removed as fluff, but I'll leave it for a few days for sources to be added. Kurando | ^_^ 08:15, 5 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is an interesting panegyric. However, I think it might get even better if we attempt to turn it in to an encyclopaedia article like the other 1.2 million in the English Wikiepedia. I am on the case. Badgerpatrol 00:52, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Material that fluffy is often worth Googling, it's frequently a coyvio. Disembrangler (talk) 11:17, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]