Talk:David Boren

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

University of Oxford

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma High‑importance

	Oklahoma portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oklahoma on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OklahomaWikipedia:WikiProject OklahomaTemplate:WikiProject OklahomaOklahoma articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by OU Task-force (assessed as High-importance).

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

United States: District of Columbia / Governors Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. governors (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

who keeps adding crap to this page? i just went through an extensive clean-up. please stop adding specious material. Waltersobchak 04:54, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What does it mean that a newspaper "sponsored" Boren's career? That notion doesn't make sense in American politics.

Someone familiar with this subject (i.e.; not me) should check out this brand-new article I came across: Boren family. I slapped a bunch of tags on it, but clean-up is beyond my abilities here. --Calton | Talk 00:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC) ______________________________________________________________________________[reply]

I can provide scans of these published materials if the Wikipedia editors will provide an email address where I can send them. In July 1993, the Texas Triangle, a gay publication, had an article quoting Queer Nation activist Michael Petrelis. Relying on Michelangelo Signorile's book Queer in America, Petrelis accused Boren of male-on-male sexual harassment. Observing that OU president Richard Van Horn announced his resignation in October, Boren began to campaign with the OU regents for the job. After he was appointed by them he announced his resignation from the Senate. All of this is verifiable fact. I obtained The Texas Triangle article from the Austin library. In 1995, former Rhodes Scholar W. Scott Thompson verified that Boren was homosexual in his book The Price of Achievement. Thompson, a Reagan appointee who came out as gay himself in the 1980s, knew Boren personally at Oxford. He later became a faculty member at Tufts University. Thompson also mentioned Queer in America in his book. The facts indicate strongly that Petrelis was right, and Boren gave up one of the most powerful seats in the U.S. Senate, with two years remaining on the term, because he was being outed and had to duck and run back to Oklahoma. (posted by Michael Wright, mpwright9@aol.com) ______________________________________________________________________________

SPONSORSHIP BY A NEWSPAPER?

A user asks the question: "what does it mean that a newspaper 'sponsored' Boren's career?'" Anyone who knows anything about Oklahoma politics knows that Boren has always been in tight cahoots with the tycoons of the Gaylord family, publishers of The Daily Oklahoman. That newspaper, called "the worst newspaper in America" by the Columbia Journalism Review, supported Boren in all of his political races since he ran for governor in 1974. The Gaylord family has continued to be his propagandist during his years as OU's president, following his resignation from the U.S. Senate. See the CJR for Jan/Feb 1999 for the "worst newspaper" article. It's in their online archive. It also reports a "multi-million dollar" tax favor which the corrupt Boren did for his Gaylord sponsors when he was a U.S. Senator. 129.15.105.120 03:43, 16 April 2007 (UTC) Michael Wright mpwright9@aol.com[reply]

Editors can email me for documentation of factual claims I have made.

_________________________________________________________________________________

Dude, you are even on here? get a life man.

_________________________________________________________________________________

I deleted material on the financial situation of the University of Oklahoma that was unsourced and/or misleading. The University's bond indebtedness has been increasing, but its assets have also been increasing. According to the latest financial statements of the Norman campus and the Health Sciences center, the University's financial situation has been improving for (at least) the last two or three years. In particular, the University's bond rating recently improved, resulting in a savings on interest paid on the bonds. The bonds were to finance a variety of infrastructure needs and research facilities; it's not clear what amount was used for new construction. It's also not clear exactly what this material, and the assertion that enrollments are declining, are doing in an article on David Boren. They would seem to be better placed in the article on the University of Oklahoma itself. Phorse 23:06, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Michael P. Wright is a cyber stalker, and is obsessed with DLB; and has made the outrageous and ridiculous online accusations blaming the 9-11 terrorist attacks on DLB —Preceding unsigned comment added by Okiewriter (talk • contribs) 06:22, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perot?

Someone recently mentioned to me that Ross Perot wanted this man as his running mate when he ran for president, but he declined. If this is true, it should be mentioned in the article somewhere. Andre (talk) 07:45, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SAE incident

@Mason.Jones: - given Boren's career (Senator, Governor, 20-year career as president of a major university, among other things) I fail to see how extensive coverage of the SAE incident can possibly be justified per WP:UNDUE. Guettarda (talk) 17:26, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To elaborate a little - this is already covered in three other articles, including one dedicated to the topic. The incident is notable, but it's not a notable aspect of Boren's career. Guettarda (talk) 18:14, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Trying something else, since no one else has commented here. Guettarda (talk) 19:42, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is no "compromise" in your solution -- you have censored an entire paragraph pertaining to an important incident on the campus that President Boren has adjudicated himself. He has been interviewed about this on all major networks. WP's "UNDUE" protocol concerns the weight of viewpoints in an article, not whether to censor the entire subject outright, which you have done.Mason.Jones (talk) 00:10, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mason.Jones: - So you're saying that after a career spanning almost 50 years in which he served as Senator, Governor, and other important roles, this incident should occupy 6% of the word-count of the article? That's what you consider WP:DUE weight? And surely you've heard of WP:RECENTISM?

And don't make absurd accusations of censorship - I voted to keep the article, I argued in favour of keeping the incident in the main OU article - and I added a link to the "See also"" - a link, I note, you have chosen to delete from this article. Rather curious behaviour, I must say. Guettarda (talk) 07:35, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Whether the incident should occupy 6% of the article is not the issue. It can occupy 2% or 4%, at the end of a previous section (with no subheading), but nonetheless it should be retained in some form. A very emphatic administrative decision was made by President Boren, pertaining to a significant media event this year. This is not about the Kardashians; it is about a large U.S. university campus. To remove a well-sourced paragraph from an article and relegate it to "See also" is excessive "editing" on your part.Mason.Jones (talk) 15:11, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David L. Boren. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140821193635/http://www.nectfl.org/awards-james-w-dodge-foreign-language-advocate-award to http://www.nectfl.org/awards-james-w-dodge-foreign-language-advocate-award

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:36, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]