Talk:David Blackwell

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to University of California, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of CaliforniaUniversity of California articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Statistics High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

First black tenured professor

The article claims that Prof. Blackwell was the first black tenured professor at UC Berkeley, but this seems to be incorrect. The first black tenured professor at UC Berkeley was in fact the first black tenured professor in the entire University of California system, Joseph Gier: https://eecs.berkeley.edu/about/history/gier. It seems Prof. Blackwell was the first tenured black professor at UC Berkeley with the rank of "Full Professor", but not the first with tenure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minilek (talk • contribs) 18:14, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:DHBlackwell.jpg

Image:DHBlackwell.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

I've reverted to before the first copyvio, which unfortunately was back in February 2007. Superm401 - Talk 10:12, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

... and in doing so, wiped out most of the text of the article. Please be more careful in the future! There was no need to revert the article to a year-old version simply to remove the photo. qitaana (talk) 13:46, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You misunderstood. I did not revert back to February 2007 because of the photo. I reverted because copyright infringements had been introduced into the text, which is why the article was tagged as a copyvio. The first copyvio was introduced on February 10, 2007, so I had to revert to the edit before that. See Wikipedia:Copyright infringement, which says, "If there is a clean revision in the page history, revert to it." I reverted to the most recent clean revision.

After the revert, I removed the photo link because it was a redlink. Note that I am not the one that deleted the photo; that was Maxim. Superm401 - Talk 16:45, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

david blackwell

a picture david blackwell —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.32.246.76 (talk) 00:31, 26 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It does not say in google

Dr. Echenique's comment on this article

Dr. Echenique has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:

Focuses on the life of Blackwell, but omits a description of his main contributions. This is a shame. It would be good to at least enumerate what he is known for and provide links to the relevant Wikipedia articles.

We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.

Dr. Echenique has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:

Reference : Juan Dubra & Echenique, Federico, 2001. "Monotone Preferences over Information," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1297, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.

ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 02:49, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on David Blackwell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100622110021/http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/images/stories/docs/blackwell%20packet.pdf to http://www.stat.berkeley.edu/images/stories/docs/blackwell%20packet.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:58, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]