Talk:Dave Gallaher Trophy

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rugby union Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rugby union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rugby union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rugby unionWikipedia:WikiProject Rugby unionTemplate:WikiProject Rugby unionrugby union articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

France

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I thought I'd better point out that Dave Gallaher was in fact killed at Passchendaele, which is in Belgium, not France, but then, the Belgians aren't very noted for playing rugby! -- Arwel (talk) 14:50, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see what your point is. Nowhere in the article is it claimed that he died in France. GringoInChile 15:40, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Err, the first sentence: "...named after Dave Gallaher, the famous 1905-06 All Black captain who died in France during World War I."? -- Arwel (talk) 17:56, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

aaaahhh, OK me dumb!! :) But then, why don't you change it?GringoInChile 02:43, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thought I'd clear it here first - people sometimes get funny about unexplained changes! -- Arwel (talk) 07:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've been bold and changed it to be more accurate Lisiate (talk) 00:30, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Challenge

The bit about only one selected test out of two counting is uncited and contradicts the news reports I've seen. jnestorius^(talk) 04:53, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]