Talk:Dave Asprey
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dave Asprey article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unsourced updates
[edit]It looks like Dave's fans have discovered the new article and would like to see it updated, but are clueless about such things as WP:V and WP:RS. I'll try to keep it objective and sourced. Dicklyon (talk) 22:13, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Neutrality
[edit]I have tagged one paragraph for neutrality problems, as its main purpose seems to debunk, rather than describe, Mr. Asprey's theory on diet. --Gertanis (talk) 00:43, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- I created a Criticism section and moved the sections that aim to debunk the bulletproof diet into it. Does that resolve your concerns? Funfactsandwheretofindthem (talk) 20:31, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
The whole "Reception" section is entirely biased. It lists only negative criticism and some, neutral. The *principle* of _neutrality_ means that every negative must be weighed up by one positive. It is not hard to find dieters who have tried and found weight reduction on the BP diet and worst of all, the clear anti-Asprey bias occupies useful space for more *relevant* criticism of Asprey. Like disseminating knowledge about problems with foods, but at the same time offering his own products as the "best alternative" (see the BP diet roadmap, link , many of the green foods are his own products).
Note: the roadmap in the link is incomplete, there are more examples
Addeps3 (talk) 11:38, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- The "principle of neutrality" you invented is not valid on Wikipedia. If we only find negative reactions from reliable sources, that's how it is. See WP:NPOV. --Hob Gadling (talk) 19:29, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:23, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class Alternative views articles
- Low-importance Alternative views articles
- WikiProject Alternative views articles
- C-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- C-Class Southern California articles
- Low-importance Southern California articles
- Southern California task force articles
- C-Class California State University articles
- Low-importance California State University articles
- California State University task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- C-Class Health and fitness articles
- Low-importance Health and fitness articles
- WikiProject Health and fitness articles
- C-Class University of California articles
- Low-importance University of California articles
- Low-importance University of California, Santa Barbara articles
- WikiProject University of California articles