Talk:DatalogZ
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
"Stylized as"
[edit]@Eejit43: Thanks for helping out with this page! I have a question about your edit. I'm not sure I agree that Datalogℤ is a "stylized" version of "DatalogZ. In the papers in the references, "DatalogZ" is never used, only Datalogℤ. I worry that this might be confusing to readers, who might go on to think that using "DatalogZ" is a valid way to refer to Datalogℤ. What do you think? Am I misunderstanding something? siddharthist (talk) 23:32, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Siddharthist seeing as the page exists at "DatalogZ" (don't move it, that is likely the correct title), I think that is the best way to put it. Personally if searching or referring to the subject, "DatalogZ" is much more simple to write, and even if none of the current references use it, I think it is still good to reflect in the lead (searching Wikiepdia for "stylized as" shows similar usage). ~ Eejit43 (talk) 23:46, 5 March 2023 (UTC)