Talk:Data forwarder

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 June 2018. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merged with Operand forwarding?

The intro to operand forwarding says it's also known as data forwarding. I can't say I understand what either is or if they're different, is there someone with more knowledge who can say whether the articles whould be merged? - 37.171.53.153 (talk) 11:42, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think a merge makes sense for the time being rather than have this stub marooned in its own. Hopefully at a later time editors with more specialist knowledge can contribute, and might decide there’s another material to demerge again. Mccapra (talk) 05:58, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. These are two completely different ideas, one (here) is a kind of generic retransmitter, one is a very clearly defined CPU architecture element. That said, I think this article should not be left as-is. --Викидим (talk) 22:45, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

State of the article

Needles to day, the article is in a pretty bad shape: no sources and the subject is of very questionable WP:SIGCOV. That said,

if the article is not improved, I would support a new WP:AfD and vote Delete;
I would not initiate an AfD myself, as it actually can be improved;
I have added some trivial text that puts the subject in at least some context;
I am not planning to look for sources - but please do not delete my text without deleting the rest of the article (that is also unsourced);

Викидим (talk) 23:18, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: added three citations that support this as more than a simple definition.

User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:11, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]