Talk:DataMirror

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Corporate Bias (POV)

It appears the original contributor of this article (responsible for the bulk of the existing content), Swintrob, is Suzanne Wintrob of DataMirror, Corporate Communications. -- Robocoder (talk | contribs) 15:32, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is really a case of the wikipedia community being "holier than thou". Come on the "claims" of this pubic company have been verified by third party accountants and auditors. The customer counts and office locations are accurate. Clear example of bias by the wikipedia police. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.136.26.232 (talk • contribs) .

Perhaps this user would like to mention that they work for Datamirror, rather than commenting anonymously. It's easy to respond to your complaint: If the claims of this pubic, or even public company have been verified, then provide the verification requested by wikipedia policy. If you are unwilling, or too lazy, to follow the terms and conditions wikipedia requests of users, then perhaps you should stop editing on this site. See WP:MS. --Saganaki- 02:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Anonymous, please refer to Wikipedia's 5 Pillars. The DataMirror article was already justifiably tagged advert before I added the equally justified pov tag. Wikipedia does not restrict DataMirror's freedom to publicize its company and products. However, any content contributed to Wikipedia is subject to Wikipedia's policies, guidelines, and guiding principles. This includes being mercilessly edited. -- Robocoder (t|c) 17:05, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]