Talk:DataHand

DataHand is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles

Occupational Safety and Health Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Ergonomic"

I suppose this might be ergonomic for some people, but everyone has different needs, and it isn't accessible or ergonomic for as many people as conventional non-chordal keyboards, "space cadet" keyboards, one-handed chordal keyboards, one-handed non-chordal keyboards, etc. depending who is using them. One-side-fits all ergonomics isn't ergonomic. 108.48.94.155 (talk) 22:44, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This class of keyboards has many different adjustments:

- Palm rests for the datahand come in 2 sizes, for the newer boards, they are 3D printed, so pretty much anything you can print.

- On the DH, the finger clusters can be moved front/back and up/down, on both the left and right sides. A very wide range.

- On the newer boards, literally every finger cluster's position can be custom, in all 6 degrees of freedom within some pretty sane limits.

- In conclusion: The objections above make no sense for the Datahand, and even less for the more modern boards of this "lineage". 71.232.39.112 (talk) 17:38, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]