Talk:Dartford F.C.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dartford F.C. article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Kent Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

Football: English non-league Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the English non-league task force (assessed as Low-importance).

A note on British English

British English should be used for articles on Britain related topics. Likewise, American English should be used on articles pertaining to American topics. For a clearer example, please visit this sub-section on the differences between their usage. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 01:33, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

Actually, that article is copied from this Wikipedia entry. The original source for this article is from a document outlining the club's history which was freely passed on to other clubs in our league for inclusion in match-day programmes, etc. It was also made widely available on the club's old website. It was written by Mike Brett-Smith, a director of the club. Given the subsequent (substantial) edits to this information, I am unsure how to attribute the text. Steveboswell (talk) 11:41, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:DartfordFootballClubPrincesParkPlan.jpg

Image:DartfordFootballClubPrincesParkPlan.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:50, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This image has now been removed Steveboswell (talk) 11:43, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Transfers Section

I'm a bit critical of this section. Not only does it seem somewhat pointless and trivial, but a lot of these 'transfers' are not actual club-to-club transfers but occur when the club releases a player and he joins somewhere else. --Half Price (talk) 20:15, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Get rid of it altogether, it's ridiculously recentist and unencyclopedic -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:42, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Half Price (talk) 09:40, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Dartford FC badge.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:22, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Charley McMillan-Lopez

Any Dartford fans got any recollection of a youth player called Charley McMillan-Lopez being at the club - for context [see discussions on WikiProject Football] Zanoni (talk) 15:03, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]