Talk:Dark photon

The figure on the constraints for the mass should be removed. There is not proper citation other than "own work" and no way to verify it's accuracy. Plus it is not mentioned in the text. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:DF0:0:202C:F564:325E:FDFD:B69D (talk) 23:40, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Smilner2.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Darkcast

Attic Salt the Darkcast paper is already cited. Removing the link to Darkcast just makes it more difficult for users to find the appropriate source material.

Re: boldfacing "dark electromagnetism"

(1) MOS:BOLDSYN: "If an article is about an event involving a subject about which there is no main article, especially if the article is the target of a redirect, the subject should be in bold..."
(2) Carroll, Sean M. (October 29, 2008). "Dark photons". Retrieved 23 February 2015. says: "... just like ordinary matter couples to a long-range force known as “electromagnetism” mediated by particles called “photons,” dark matter couples to a new long-range force known (henceforth) as “dark electromagnetism,” mediated by particles known (from now on) as “dark photons." --Omnipaedista (talk) 17:04, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think I am wrong. The same source says: "So there can be dark electric fields, dark magnetic fields, dark radiation, etc." So dark electromagnetism should indeed redirect to dark radiation. --Omnipaedista (talk) 18:03, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]