Talk:Daria Mochly-Rosen

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

revert

XOR'easter [1]not certain why this was reverted, it had been trimmed b/c it was showing up as copyvio, and therefore not being released to Google after I had reviewed it?--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:45, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted it because that source (and everything else I can find) indicates that the drugs don't exist yet. The phrasing should indicate that they are still in development. If some damn algorithm thinks it's a copyright violation, that's the algorithm's problem for being too dumb to recognize bland factual statements that involved no creativity in writing in the first place. In the future, if automated copyvio detection is the reason for a change, please indicate that in your edit summary. I have tweaked the phrasing of that sentence to preserve the meaning while using different words. XOR'easter (talk) 17:09, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]