This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
This piece might fit within the rock fans definition of Classical, but from what i've heard it certainly isn't, and perhaps the term orchestral folksong or something similar would be more appropriate. If it genuinely fitted into the genre of Classical music, features such as leading notes would be apparent. A good example of modal (as opposed to diatonic) harmony is in shown by this piece http://www.dargaard.com/bearer%20of%20the%20flame.mp3, in which every (or almost) dominant chord is minor, which clearly suggests the aeolian mode. Classical music refers to either the diatonic western music from roughly 1700-1820 or is a blanket term for formal european art music (i.e. not regional folk music). The most important factors in defining a work as classical in the broader sense are whether the composition follows some formal set of musical conventions established at the time, and whether it is notated for practice and performance. I think folk music is probably a far more accurate term, and I mean this in an entirely uncondescending way.
There is a little problem in the english wikipedia, because Neo-classical isn't Neoclassicism. Neo-classical is a new genre from the '80s, founded by music groups like In The Nursery and Dead Can Dance. It's more "freestyle classical", created by synthesizers and orchestral samples.
I am questioning the sentence at the beginning of this article, which reads The genre is often heavily debated, but is entirely made on keyboards. This is a pretty large claim. I am a big fan of neoclassical (dark wave) music, including Dargaard's, and am contributing to the neoclassical (dark wave) article on WP. To say that this music is entirely made on keyboards is not only inaccurate; it is simply wrong. Please consider either deleting this sentence or amending it. See the article on neoclassical (dark wave) for a better description of this genre. Thanks. Daniel Grünfeld (talk) 16:37, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Very well. I am editing this section of the main article, since no one is interested in providing a citation for this rather extreme statement. Daniel Grünfeld (talk) 01:20, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
