Talk:Dar al-Harb

I have questions regarding this article; anyone choose to participate? Thank you. Nobs01 17:23, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

merge

The concept of dar al harb can only be understood in context with dar al islam . Without it , it doesnt make any sence . Both these should be merged . F.a.y.^{تبادله خيال} ^{^/c} 09:12, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

While I feel that both should their own respective articles, the way they stand now, they are almost carbon copies of one another. Unless someone has something to add to either of these articles that would differentiate it from the other, a merger may be desired. Pepsidrinka 00:20, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well thats the main point .Why have two carbon copies of the same article , provided with the fact that one cant be understood without the context of the other . F.a.y.^{تبادله خيال} ^{^/c} 19:42, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I support the merger, for the reason stated above: that neither term can be understood without mention of the other. Same logic as for merging enclave and exclave. //Big Adamsky 11:07, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What I meant was, I think a merger should be temporary because surely more information could be added to each topic to distinguish them and merit seperate articles. Pepsidrinka 17:52, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I merged. Cuñado

- Talk 17:45, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]