Talk:Danish India

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: History Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in January 2014.

Citation issues

This article received several infoboxes related to missing or inadequate citations, dated July, 2016. Reviewing the edit history, and looking over the article, it is clear that there have been many edits to correct this situation. It is apparent to me that all but one of the infoboxes should be removed, and I will remove them as an independent party with no history of edits on the page. I feel that the missing citation infobox in the"Napoleonic Wars and Decline" section should remain,as it is still uncited. Once that issue is resolved, editors from WikiProject India and WikiProject Denmark may want to reasses the class=C, and consider a promotion to B. Cheers Bill McKenna (talk) 03:00, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The section on 'The Second Danish East India Company (1670–1772) lacks citations and needs work to improve its grammar. Manicmarvin (talk) 10:37, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Treaty between Denmark and British East India Company for transferring Danish settlements in India, 1845.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Treaty between Denmark and British East India Company for transferring Danish settlements in India, 1845.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:36, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Location of Pipli

Hello. I’m unsure about the location of “Pipli” (as the sources describe the town). When linking Pipli, this town comes up, and it also appears that this is the town shown on the map in the articles infobox. However, today i stumpled uppon an article for another town called Pipili. This town seems to also be linked to European colonialism, with it being the HQs of Dutch Bengal, and it being located closer to the ocean.

Both locations are located in Bengal, and both a plausable to be the “Pipli” the sources describe as a Danish factors. So which is right? If anyone know, please answer! 80.163.57.94 (talk) 11:25, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]