Talk:Danielson, Connecticut

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Connecticut Mid‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed merger

Merger discussion moved to Talk:List of RHPs in CT#Broad Street-Davis Park Historic District in parallel with other CT NRHP merger proposals. Proposer's statement moved to there. Please continue there. doncram (talk) 01:15, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

what is Danielson

the article currently claims it is a borough

the Broad Street-Davis Park HD NRHP document states that it is a section

i think the other NRHP doc says that it is a former borough.

Someone should find out what this is and write about it. Arguments about forcing mergers of decently sourced NRHP articles, to prevent others from developing them, into this crummy article are ridiculous. doncram (talk) 22:39, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A "section" is a generic term that is used to mean any named portion of a town that is different in name from the town. It is a term interchangeable with village or neighborhood or borough. I don't know why one NRHP doc says it is a former borough. The latest State Register and Manual lists it as a borough. The Town of Killingly website lists it as a borough. Clearly the reference to "former borough" is incorrect. --Polaron | Talk 01:10, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As Polaron says (and has been explained several times previously), "section" is a generic term in in Connecticut.
I also don't why the nom forms don't clearly name it as a borough, but I can speculate. (But only on talk pages, not in articles -- wink.) Although the first page of the Broad Street-Davis Park nom form says "Danielson section of Killingly", later on the nom form tells about the history of the borough. Apparently, the borough formerly included part of the town of Brooklyn, and later was trimmed back to just include part of Killingly. That might lead some people to refer to the "Danielson section of Killingly" in order to distinguish it from the "Danielson section of Brooklyn". As for the Main Street HD nom form that does say it was formerly a borough, it also has a lot of info on the borough history. My hunch is that the Hartford-based consultants who filled in the form made a mistake. According to Borough (Connecticut), there are only 8 functioning boroughs in Connecticut that are not coextensive with the town, and most of them are very small, so it is likely that city kids working for a consulting firm thought that this governmental structure was just an extinct historical oddity. --Orlady (talk) 03:13, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Danielson, Connecticut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:47, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]