Talk:Daniel Hardcastle

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Daniel Hardcastle article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 January 2021. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Internet culture

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

YouTube Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject YouTube To-do:

A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see list.
Assess : Apply the assessment scale on Unknown-importance YouTube articles + Unassessed YouTube articles
Cleanup : See cleanup listing
Maintain : This WikiProject
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class YouTube articles
Other :
- Substitute {{WikiProject YouTube/Invite Members}} on user talk pages
- Check out edit requests on Talk:List of YouTubers

Verifiability

Some concerns on this article which need to be addressed are the Verifiability of many facts as they are self-published sources. To resolve these issues we should try to find sources which are not self-published, e.g. not YouTube videos produced by the Nerdcubed Brand. - Alexratman 23:06, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Further to my comment of Verifiability on the 23rd of October 2019, this has been addressed somewhat. However a lot of the sources that are still being used are directly published by the Nerdcubed Brand on Youtube, or are self-published sources, or are publications which are copying or quoting a tweet by the Nerdcubed Brand. The other repeated source is the published book by Daniel Hardcastle, which was self published by the Nerdcubed Brand through a crowd funding campaign. All contributors should review the Verifiability page before adding content or restoring content which is removed for not being verifiable. I plan to add the Verifiability template to this page to inform new visitors of the lack of verifiability of claims on the page. - Alexratman 07:23, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A comment was made by user Dmartin969 stating that the self published sources are suitable for this article based on ABOUTSELF. Unfortunately I cannot agree, based on three of the exclusions listed on that page. The material is self-serving, as shown by the fact that Daniel Hardcastle has previously mentioned that his YouTube page was unverified as he was not widely recognised outside of YouTube. Furthermore, there is reasonable doubt as to the sources authenticity; Daniel Hardcastle has repeatedly lied about facts directly related to him in order to make jokes (see the ongoing joke about living in Canada), protect his anonymity and reduce the risk of stalking. Finally, and probably most critical, the article must not be primarily based on such sources. Which in this case it most definitely is, as shown by the sheer number of self published sources used throughout the article. If there isn’t a counter argument presented against this within 7 days I will move forward with reinstating the Verifiability Template to inform visitors of the lack of verifiable information on the page. - Alexratman 15:12, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

I plan to remove the notability template based on the following cirteria:

From WP:anybio(1), "The person has received a well-known and significant award or honour": Times #1 bestseller

From WP:author(3), "The person has created...a significant or well-known work or collective body of work": Wrote a book that reached was a #1 best seller, AND has created a YouTube channel that has over 2.5 million subscirbers and 1 billion views.

From WP:ENTERTAINER(2), "Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following.": Major YouTube fanbase, which could be considered a cult following.

I feel like based on meeting multiple crieteria present in WP:BIO this individual clearly meets the notability requiremnts.

dmartin969 01:18, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]