Talk:Daniel Arnoldi
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Daniel Arnoldi appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 August 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 08:50, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that in 1836, a jury ignored the judge's advice and found Daniel Arnoldi guilty of assaulting a black man? Source: "In July, Arnoldi was tried for his assault on Grant; the jury, ignoring the judge's direction, found him guilty." [1]
- ALT1: ... that Daniel Arnoldi was the first president of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Lower Canada? Source: "Dr. Arnoldi was one of the eminent physicians of Montreal, the first president of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Lower Canada." [2]
- ALT2: ... that doctors from McGill College opposed Daniel Arnoldi's candidacy to chair a medical licencing board, but 14 years later he received an honorary degree from the college? Source: "John Stephenson...and William Robertson...founded...the Faculty of Medicine of McGill College" "Robertson and Stephenson fought the nomination energetically, but in vain." "he had been awarded a doctorate honoris causa by McGill College." [3]
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/William H. Davis (educator)
5x expanded by Z1720 (talk). Self-nominated at 23:44, 29 July 2022 (UTC).
- Article looks good; clearly long enough. ALT0 is the most interesting to me, although it should probably say what the judge's advice was. Earwig score looks great. This looks ready to me. —VersaceSpace 🌃 14:52, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Hi VersaceSpace, if the article is approved, please add the green tick with this code: {{subst:DYKtick}}. If it is not approved, please let me know what your concerns are and I'll address them. Thanks! Z1720 (talk) 15:08, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Z1720, you could probably tell this is my first QPQ. —VersaceSpace 🌃 15:10, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- @VersaceSpace: Thanks for reviewing! I hope it was a fun experience and that you will do it again. Z1720 (talk) 15:12, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
Distorted portrait
[edit]The portrait looks laterally compressed. In comparison with the image here it is indeed about 10% compressed. I know, I really should address the issue at Commons, not here, but I'm hoping that someone else more motivated than I am about this can do so. There are also other issues tagged at Commons. Jmchutchinson (talk) 13:39, 26 August 2022 (UTC)