This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article should be deleted the way it is right now, and its doubtful whether the UN appointed the Pinoy baby as the "7B baby", other news sources say UN did not choose a particular person, like they did when the 6B was reached.
So did Russia (in dutch). It also contains the argumenent that the UN did not choose a particular baby, because the landmark is not really a reason to be only optimistic, as the planet faces quite some problems. I'd really like to see a UN-publication that states they have indicated Danica. Alexander and Pyotr
This article is really incomplete, and should be written with overview, not just from one article. Stupid wikipedia.
