Talk:Dani California/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
Some parts, particularly the end of the "Reception" section, contain too stubby prose, and there's an accumulation of cruft.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
There is a serious shortage of references, to the point where it is sometimes unclear what are the sources for direct quotes.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
There is no section on composition. There is a short paragraph on the music under "Origins and character", but this is entirely lacking in references.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Lampman (talk) 16:03, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since no significant improvements have been made to the article over the last week, I will now delist it. Lampman (talk) 23:40, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]