Talk:Dan Jason

This article was nominated for deletion on January 7 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

I felt I wrote a pretty darn good first article about a locally influential figure; Dan Jason. My intention was to start an article that other editors could later add on to. I disagree with NickCatal that Mr. Jason is an too obscure an individual to have his own page, his company has a seed catalog mailing list of over 10,000 and I would imagine that many other authors have a page. Please do a google search with his name before doing anything too rash. I look forward to discussing this more.

Montydog

Per your request I have created a request for deletion instead of a speedy-delete. This will allow you to discuss your objections before the article's removal --Nick Catalano (Talk) 21:38, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]