Talk:Dan Margulis

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Notability

Someone added a template claiming that Margulis was not notable enough for an article. I do not know what triggered that bizarre idea. It is easy to find a large number of articles and references to his works. Just check the "What links here" list in Wikipedia alone. Or google for him or check the list of books he has written and their impact and reviews. Mlewan (talk) 08:10, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. He is one of the first three people inducted simultaneously into the Photoshop Hall of Fame, and is either the best selling Photoshop author or at least in the top 5 Photoshop-related authors in history. He is definitely noteworthy enough to be included. I don't know what is required in order to have a {prod} or whatever tag removed from an article, but his definitely should be. Sjledet (talk) 13:50, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]