Talk:Dan Carlin

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dan Carlin article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Podcasting Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable podcasts and podcast-related information on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PodcastingWikipedia:WikiProject PodcastingTemplate:WikiProject Podcastingpodcasting articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

What needs references?

Perhaps Scientizzle can tell us exactly what portions of the article are so controversial that they need references. IMO, the Common Sense show itself is your reference. I've listened to every show, and I think the author of this article pretty much nailed it. 206.124.6.154 01:16, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That may be true, but notability isn't really asserted well and there's a lot of claims that should be referenced specifically with independent reliable sources. This will help the article meet Wikipedia's policies of verifiability, no original research, and neutral point-of-view. The current article is kind of fawning and there is no link to any external coverage of Carlin nor his shows. — Scientizzle 03:12, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dude. It's a PODCAST. "External coverage?" LOL. 206.124.6.154 (talk) 20:10, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Carlin himself should have some external coverage ... also, a "Criticism" section would be nice. It's what I came here for in the first place. 128.146.172.77 (talk) 00:26, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What's that old saying...if you want it done right?

[1]
[2]
[3]
[4] — Scientizzle 00:06, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Popularity Data

I inserted info from the iTunes store about the "hardcore history" podcast . . . just writing the podcast is popular seemed too vague . . . but I am not sure about bibliographic formatting for podcasts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.91.89.41 (talk) 05:12, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed your iTunes information because it seemed an arbitrary metric for anyone that doesn't use the service. Besides, why do we need to know about the show's popularity? Let me know your thoughts. Fascinoma (talk) 21:55, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I added data from an LA Times interview on the Common Sense download data as of 2016 Eminentlycurious (talk) 00:12, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Podcast episodes

Does this page really need a list of all the Hardcore History episodes? The information is available on Dan Carlin's website and all the descriptions are pulled word-for-word from there. I propose deleting it. Fascinoma (talk) 21:58, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should bring back the list of Hardcore History episodes. I was unable to find anything on the internet similar to that useful list of episodes. Fotomut (talk) 20:46, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See Dan Carlin's site for a list of all episodes with description. I believe adding an entire episode list on this page would cause undue weight. BU Rob13 (talk) 22:54, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

️⃣ I think they should be added back. Unintuitive site design, splitting up of episodes into packs and sections (King of Kings, Ghosts of the Ostfront, Blueprint for Armageddon, "Extra" packs, etc.) and a website that is designed and suited to the sale of digital goods is not the same as having a concise, dated, and chronological list of episodes. If nothing else, why not spin it off into its own page? Lostinvention (talk) 05:40, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How old is he?

He seems to have been active since the 90s, so he is probably in his 40s sometime. Seems like pretty basic information. I can't find a source to add it, though. Has he mentioned it in one of his shows? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.28.188.56 (talk) 18:28, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

He mentions in a recent Common Sense episode that he was born in 1965. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.21.239.33 (talk) 16:33, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Common Sense

Dan's publicist did an excellent job with the the section, now could we get some actual information? 166.216.165.126 (talk) 17:35, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The references supplied are weak and the POV needs some work here. I'll start cleaning up some of the mess and welcome anyone else to do the same. Kyle^(talk) 19:28, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dan Carlin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121112090209/http://stitcher.promotw.com/ to http://stitcher.promotw.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:56, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dan Carlin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100106083424/http://podcastawards.com/ to http://podcastawards.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:40, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An incomplete sentence

"Hardcore History, which has millions of downloads per episode, received over 350,000 in a 24-hour period on May 6, 2015."
Is it supposed to mean "350,00 downloads?"--Adûnâi (talk) 15:28, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch.

Contextually its a bit confusing, but yes, it seems it does need “downloads” added, a change i will make. The source citation mentions “351,000 downloads in a 24-hour period on may 6, 2015.” MrSirGuyFriendBuddyOlPal (talk) 05:56, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hardcore History

Should Dan_Carlin#Hardcore_History be forked out to Hardcore History? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 19:02, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The show itself and Dan are inextricably linked, currently. A second page for the shows only begs the question, if HH, why not CS too? Dan is most well known for podcasts in which it is him speaking 95%+ of the time. To me it seems unnecessary/redundant.

I am curious as to why forking out would be a good idea. MrSirGuyFriendBuddyOlPal (talk) 05:50, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Another Believer and MrSirGuyFriendBuddyOlPal: I think we should fork out the content because the podcast is clearly a notable subject on it's own. I doubt CS is actually notable on it's own. TipsyElephant (talk) 11:44, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Theater of the Mind?

Hardcore History is described as having "a 'Theater of the Mind' style without explanation. What is it? 96.224.252.21 (talk) 00:08, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hardcore history history

How do I access the older hardcore history episodes iv done searches over several platforms and the oldest available is kings of kings 1 2600:387:F:816:0:0:0:B (talk) 19:03, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]