Talk:Damsel (2024 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:

Article name?

Since a source says it might be released in 2023, why haven’t we changed it to Damsel (2023 film) yet. I just want to help make stuff look good. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2601:44:8900:2900:F8A6:5457:B460:DEBA

Cast

The page has a few mistakes on the roles played by the cast. Stevenwsimmons (talk) 03:00, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Would you care to explain what the mistakes are? Mike Allen 03:17, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We might overdo the plot cutdowns

Hi, @Dan!

I know I'm doing this too, but we might overdo the plot cutdowns. Unless there's something really wrong (like when one editor added like more than two kilobytes – 2048+ bytes, to be exact) – to the plot summary. It's probably cool to keep it easy to read, yes, though don't you think we're oversimplifying it or watering it down while missing key details? So far, I haven't seen such a thing. I'm just looking out in advance – maybe one day someone other than one of us could be cutting down too much plot where it undershoots below required minimum word count.

So, maybe we should relax on the plot cutdowns? Don't take my word for it though, we could still do it – this message is just a danger sign coming from me (and, well, I could go against my own word and go back to cutting plot.) Thanks! Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 08:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

64.8 hours viewed

The viewership metrics say 64.8 hours viewed.

Does this mean 64.8 million hours viewed and the screen rant source made a mistake? 2A0A:EF40:23E:C101:C9CF:69B0:5B8A:31AE (talk) 15:34, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Who wrote this?

Peter Debruge of Variety wrote, "Deliciously improper at times, Damsel adheres to codes that can feel a bit calculated, less organic than crafted in response to a newly progressive corporate agenda (the signs are there at all levels, from inclusive casting to occasionally self-righteous dialogue)"

Is variety hiring Fandom Menace types? This isn't a review. It's the sort of whining I've come to expect from gamergate chuds, and belongs on Youtube or X, not an encyclopedia. Remove and replace with something better. 46.97.170.182 (talk) 13:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You replace it with something better. Mike Allen 14:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Take the issue up with Variety, Wikipedia is just here to document what the reviews from reliable sources say. Harryhenry1 (talk) 09:24, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]