Talk:Damnonii

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"In the aftermath of the Roman withdrawal they formed the Kingdom of Strathclyde." This isn't history. Can anyone offer more connection between Damnoni and Strathclyde than "Centuries later, on the territory of the Dumnoni arose the Kingdom of Strathclyde"? --Wetman 16:22, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Check the links. Besides that, the first book that comes to mind is Alistair Moffat's "Arthur and the Lost Kingdoms." ---G.T.N. (talk) 01:08, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced stub with an article

The only reference to these peoples is Ptolemy, and the reference is short, consisting of a snapshot in time from about 140 AD, with nothing before or after. Everything else is suppositions and conjectures and speculations by others. I assigned preliminary ratings; reviews and ratings by the appropriate groups might replace these in the fullness of time. Regards, Notuncurious (talk) 01:21, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Damnonii. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090426125737/http://www.nls.uk/maps/roy/antiquities/ to http://www.nls.uk/maps/roy/antiquities/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:49, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]