Jump to content

Talk:Damien O'Connor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Damien is the current MP of westcoast

[edit]

I'm not sure how to make the edits but the page needs to show that Damien has now entered his 2nd term as the current west coast MP after defeating the National candidate Chris Auchinvole in the 2011 general election. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Testthebest (talk • contribs) 19:39, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you're saying something positive, they will censor it out and delete any edits you make, no matter how well referenced they are, or so it seems. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.61.184.91 (talk) 03:24, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Censorship is alive and kicking

[edit]

I edited Wikipedia yesterday, adding factual information about Damien O'Connors involvement in rodeo and select committee processes. This was referenced with the news article from a reputable media publisher. Today I check in to see it has been entirely deleted.

This is quite unacceptable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.61.184.91 (talk) 03:05, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You said in your edit that O'Connor had been criticised, but the reference did not support this.-gadfium 07:57, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel it necessary to split straws on that, then surely it is at most appropriate to adjust the small portion of statement that is contested, or simply add 'citation needed'. Please elaborate as to what you consider the definition of criticism to be. O'Connor claimed rodeo is justified because similar injuries happen in sport, SPCA responded by stating that athletes make an informed choice to participate in sport. That is by definition a criticism of his argument. As a science grad I expect you to understand what constitutes a critique of a claim/the author of said claim for making it. O'Connor was indeed criticized in response to his claim, both in this article and elsewhere. Either way entirely deleting the entire contribution is excessive and unjustified. Do you have some kind of conflict of interest, or association with this MP? Do you weight the splitting of straws greater than allowing the public to be adequately informed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.61.184.91 (talk) 21:16, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is indeed a criticism of his argument. It is not a criticism of him. Can you see the difference? Any person is likely to have some views which others can reasonably disagree with, but we do not list every view a politican has which has been criticised in the media, unless it rises to a level of notability. You need to make a case that his views on rodeo are notable. If his views are contrary to his party's policy, and you can document that, I think that would be sufficient.
If you want to see what articles I edit, please browse through Special:Contributions/Gadfium. I have no particular interest in O'Connor, but I do have an interest in keeping Wikipedia unbiased.-gadfium 02:47, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Damien O'Connor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:26, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Damien O'Connor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:53, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Damien_O%27Connor&oldid=1200873786"