Jump to content

Talk:Damansara Utama National Secondary School

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Crazy

[edit]

With all the vandalism, I guess its wise to lock the page and start from scratch. Might be difficult for me though, I don't have much experience. Applause for the one who locked this(but the comments WERE funny).

What?

[edit]

Most were true, cept for those absurd ones. Thats how we feel and it's a wonder why nobody has written a letter to the Ministry of Education ( or maybe many people did, but to no response..typical government work) 218.208.244.89 13:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this is Wikipedia, not a ranting forum. The ministry wont just sack Norsham for doing her job. 60.50.53.70 10:03, 11 August 2007 (UTC) (Kempas 2005-2006)[reply]

Wikipedia is viewed by many people. It wouldn't be wise to use wikipedia as a ranting place. Besides, Pn. Norsham is just doing her job. Syasha15 02:22, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rant or not, most of the facts are true, and luckily like faux, i'm already out of that problematic school —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.50.64.185 (talk) 17:26, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]



SMK Damansara Utama prides itself for producing achievers in many areas. Most of the students graduating will most likely attend colleges (namely Taylors and Sunway), continue on with Form 6 or pursue further studies at local matriculation centres among other things.

[edit] Achievements <-What. Anugerah Sekolah Harapan Negara - Runner Up


I can't pinpoint everything thats wrong with this article... But I can, however, tell you that it will not win the Pulitzer prize. TL;DR: This article is filled with AIDS and failure. To fix this: REWRITE THE WHOLE THING. IT'S CRAP.

60.52.33.175 16:13, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

actually you have a point in that this article is filled with useless information, and that it needs some serious re-editing. But please do not blame the less experienced (such as myself) for not being very up to standard on editing. If we made a mistake, just correct it. And you said you're going to fix it. Then fix it, and let's see how good you are. And no, I did not edit this article. And please let's all try to be a little more civilized about the problems in this article rather than just ranting pointlessly about it. I didn't see YOU anywhere when some bold people were saving this thing from vandalism. Hey, compared to that, this article is a godsend. And by the way are you a student? Do not just rant on about it, you're all talk and no action. Be bold, in contribution, not in showing of your language.60.53.145.47 (talk) 14:17, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]