Talk:Dallas World Aquarium

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dallas World Aquarium article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Dallas-Fort Worth (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dallas-Fort Worth, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Dallas-Fort WorthWikipedia:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthTemplate:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthDallas-Fort Worth articles

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Zoo

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Zoo, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to zoos, aquaria, and aviaries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ZooWikipedia:WikiProject ZooTemplate:WikiProject ZooZoo articles

Photos (2010-08)

This article needs more photos of the aquarium. There are plenty of closeups of animals at the zoo, but these are not particularly helpful in illustrating an article which is about the zoo, not about the animals. Donlammers (talk) 14:47, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's a photo of the front entrance, which is fine for me. Hasteur (talk) 01:36, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy

As it was written, the Controversy section was extremely biased against DWA. The referenced article even had a correction saying that the original article was misleading, but that was not reflected here. I removed the biased language, mentioned that DWA had the proper permits, and added another reference. Raran75 (talk) 00:27, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]