Talk:Daimler-Benz DB 603

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft engine task force.

Military history: Aviation / Technology / European / German / World War II Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Aircraft mentioned in the lead para

On 29 July 2009 I moved three aircraft types that had been inserted into the lead para as users of this engine into the applications section instead. As my edit summary stated non-flown and experimental applications not required in lead para - moved to applications, two of the types did not fly with the engine installed and the third was only a single prototype and therefore in my judgment did not warrant mention in the lead para. On my talk page at User_talk:Ahunt#endeless User:Stefanomencarelli objected to this and so I have moved this discussion here. Does anyone think these types should be reinserted into the lead or that some of the other types still stated in the lead para are too minor to mention there and should just be in the applications section? Perhaps with the major applications in the info box this para is not required at all? - Ahunt (talk) 14:32, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]