Talk:DailyBooth

Discussion

BRING DAILYBOOTH BACK! I wasnt on dailybooth for that long, but i really found it enjoyable, seeing how different people look ect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.239.2.46 (talk) 00:13, 4 February 2013 (UTC) So far this is what we got Rttam (talk) 17:43, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I like how the page is going guys!! What more stuff do we need on here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 3marco3polo3 (talk • contribs)

Article needs some reliable sources with evidence of notability for the site. The article presently fails the minimal standards for an article about a website. Otherwise it will eventually be deleted. DMacks (talk) 17:46, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DMacks - I've added some sources, hopefully others will follow. Rttam (talk) 17:57, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So, what stuff, relevant to DB needs to be on here?--3marco3polo3 (talk) 17:55, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again, what it needs is evidence of notability, supported by reliable, third-party sources. Please supply ASAP if indeed there are sources available to support that this site is an appropriate article topic at this time. DMacks (talk) 18:08, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are we going the right way to be able to stop the page from being deleted? --3marco3polo3 (talk) 19:32, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Things are looking fine. DMacks (talk) 02:33, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Two accouts on Dailybooth for the reviews citation could be [1] and [2]. I never know how to do citations, sorry. Michaelritchie200 (talk) 19:41, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know what the account where so I cited it. Thanks for telling me, I'll sort it now :) --3marco3polo3 (talk) 20:50, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Irritated

I just wanted to say that I started this article ages ago, before it was "speedily deleted", despite my protestations. So yeah, fuck you, Wikipedia. Crazy Eddy (talk) 18:22, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The irony of your saying that within two minutes of this aside, sometimes it takes time and additional editors to put together an article that meets the minimum standards to exist here--I rechecked your original content, and still agree that it was not a viable article. DMacks (talk) 18:33, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on DailyBooth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121126071738/http://dailybooth.com/jemmahatty/1000000 to http://dailybooth.com/jemmahatty/1000000
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091228053820/http://dailybooth.com:80/blog/?p=170 to http://www.dailybooth.com/blog/?p=170
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090927005803/http://www.dailybooth.com:80/map to http://dailybooth.com/map

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:43, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on DailyBooth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090926233346/http://www.dailybooth.com:80/ to http://dailybooth.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:38, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]