Talk:Dahak
This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Photo
[edit]Hello.
The photo for this page is inaccurate. That is not Dahak, that is Dahak's servant Khrafstar who faced off against Xena in THE DELIVERER and became the Deliverer through the power of Dahak. He still referred to the burst of flame on the altar in the third person as Dahak ("Dahak already has a sacrifice in Gabrielle").
A better picture to substitute would be Iolaus possessed by Dahak in the story arc, or an image of the giant tick creature that was his true form in REDEMPTION.
Perhaps images of Hope and the Destroyer would be applicable as well, to show the legacy of Dahak's lineage through the mortal race.
Fair use rationale for Image:Dahakxena.jpg
[edit]Image:Dahakxena.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:35, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Original research
[edit]I've put the tab up there mostly because of the first paragraphs that don't cite any sources, and some of it sounds like original research ("He seems to be based..."). The last part: "Yet Dahak's recounting as well as that of the Titans suggests that... is also unverified. 129.16.49.38 12:02, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Dahakxena.jpg
[edit]Image:Dahakxena.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
history
[edit]The article does not mention the history of Dahak. In the series, it was mentioned that Dahak had been defeated by the Titans before the birth of the Greek gods. what would be the best way to write this into the article?--Marhawkman (talk) 08:11, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- Maybe begin a new section talking about Dahak pre-series. --NeilEvans (talk) 20:20, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- I guess rewrite the article to add a history time line to his bio?--Marhawkman (talk) 07:40, 3 April 2008 (UTC)